Pepe v. 4e Brand North America, LLC
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:20-cv-06494
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Pepe v. 4e Brand North America, LLC, Judge Briccetti ordered plaintiffs to choose whether to amend their complaint before the pending dismissal motion proceeds.
The order affected plaintiffs Katherine Pepe, Patricia Donadio, and June Vonderchek, and defendant 4e Brand North America, LLC, by setting deadlines and procedures for amending the complaint and responding to the pending motion to dismiss.
What happened
In Pepe v. 4e Brand North America, LLC, the defendant had filed a motion asking the court to dismiss the complaint.
The court ordered the plaintiffs to notify it by November 20, 2020, whether they would file an amended complaint or rely on the existing complaint. If they chose to amend, they had 14 days after notifying the court to file the amended complaint.
Judge Briccetti did not decide the dismissal motion. He explained that, after an amendment, the defendant would have 21 days to answer, file a new dismissal motion, or rely on its original motion.
The detailed version
- Pepe v. 4e Brand North America, LLC · No. 7:20-cv-06494
- Vincent Briccetti
- Nov. 11, 2020
Background
The plaintiffs are Katherine Pepe, Patricia Donadio, and June Vonderchek, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated people. On November 10, 2020, 4e Brand North America, LLC moved to dismiss the complaint.
Order
The court ordered the plaintiffs to notify the court by November 20, 2020, whether they intended to file an amended complaint in response to the motion to dismiss or would rely on the complaint already challenged by that motion.
If the plaintiffs chose not to amend, the motion to dismiss would proceed under the regular schedule. The court stated that it was unlikely to grant the plaintiffs another opportunity to amend to address deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed arguments in the motion. The deadlines for opposition and reply papers would be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court's local rules unless the court ordered otherwise.
If the plaintiffs chose to amend, they had to file the amended complaint no later than 14 days after notifying the court of that choice. Within 21 days after the amendment, the defendant could answer the amended complaint, file a motion to dismiss it, or notify the court that it would rely on its original motion to dismiss.
Disposition and Effect
Judge Vincent L. Briccetti issued a scheduling and case-management order; the opinion does not state that the court granted or denied the pending motion to dismiss. The order therefore addressed the plaintiffs' amendment choice and the next procedural steps, without deciding the merits of the complaint or the dismissal motion.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.