Delice v. Rhymes N Dimes Brands
- Laura Swain
- 1:20-cv-09352
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Delice v. Rhymes N Dimes Brands, Judge McMahon ordered Wisner Delice to pay fees or submit prisoner authorization within 30 days.
Wisner Delice, who was required to pay the fees or submit a prisoner authorization within 30 days to continue the action.
What happened
In Delice v. Rhymes N Dimes Brands, Wisner Delice filed a lawsuit while incarcerated and asked to proceed without paying fees upfront. He submitted the required application but not the separate authorization needed to allow payments from his prison account.
The court gave Delice 30 days to either pay $400 in fees or submit the prisoner authorization. The order said the case would be dismissed if he did not comply, and no summons would issue at that time.
Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk to mail the order to Delice and denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Delice v. Rhymes N Dimes Brands · No. 1:20-cv-09352
- Laura Swain
- Nov. 19, 2020
Background
Wisner Delice brought this civil action while incarcerated and represented himself. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees. The court explained that a prisoner seeking that permission must also submit a signed prisoner authorization.
Order
The prisoner authorization would direct the correctional facility to deduct the $350 filing fee from Delice's account in installments and send the court certified account statements for the previous six months. The court noted that the $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.
Within 30 days of the order, Delice had to either pay the full $400 in fees or submit the completed prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 20-CV-9352 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail him a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. If Delice complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's procedures; if he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.
Appeal and warning
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a strike under the prisoner-litigation statute. The order did not address the merits of Delice's claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.