Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 19, 2020

Ellis v. Broome Street Food And Drink, LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:20-cv-01814
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ellis v. Broome Street Food and Drink, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled action, allowing restoration by December 23, 2020.

Who this affects

Terrell Ellis and the defendants in the action, including Broome Street Food and Drink, LLC.

What happened

Ellis v. Broome Street Food and Drink, LLC concerned a letter from Plaintiff Terrell Ellis informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or settlement terms.

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The action could be restored to the court’s calendar if an application was made by December 23, 2020.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil further ordered that if no restoration application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ellis v. Broome Street Food And Drink, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-01814
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Nov. 19, 2020

Background

The court received a letter from Plaintiff Terrell Ellis stating that the parties had reached a settlement. The opinion does not provide the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar, provided that an application to restore it was made by December 23, 2020. The court also ordered that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The order did not resolve the merits of the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.