Kalia v. City University of New York
- Jesse Furman
- 1:19-cv-06242
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Kalia v. City University of New York, Judge Furman granted defendants’ motion, dismissed all claims, and allowed state and local claims to be refiled in state court.
Ravi Kalia’s claims were dismissed, while the judgment stated that his state- and local-law claims could be refiled in state court. The defendants prevailed in this federal case.
What happened
Kalia v. City University of New York ended with the court entering judgment for the defendants and closing the case.
The court dismissed all of Kalia’s claims. It stated that the state- and local-law claims could be refiled in state court.
Judge Furman also declined to give Kalia another opportunity to amend his complaint because he had already amended it, had notice of the alleged problems, and did not request another amendment or identify additional facts that would fix them.
The detailed version
- Kalia v. City University of New York · No. 1:19-cv-06242
- Jesse Furman
- Nov. 23, 2020
Background
The judgment states that the court’s reasons appeared in an Opinion and Order dated November 23, 2020. The judgment does not provide the underlying factual allegations or explain the specific legal grounds for dismissing each claim.
Ruling
The court granted the defendants’ motion and dismissed all of Kalia’s claims. The judgment states that the state- and local-law claims could be refiled in state court. Judgment was entered for the defendants, and the case was closed.
Leave to Amend
The court declined to grant Kalia permission to amend his complaint on its own initiative. It noted that Kalia had already been given permission to amend, had been informed of the defendants’ arguments and the complaint’s alleged deficiencies, and did not request another amendment or suggest that additional facts could cure the dismissed claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.