Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 30, 2020

Tucker v. Department of Corrections

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:20-cv-09496
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Tucker v. Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon ordered Theodore Tucker to pay fees or submit forms, warning that noncompliance would lead to dismissal.

Who this affects

The order directly affects Theodore Tucker, who must either pay the required fees or submit the required forms within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Tucker v. Department of Corrections, Theodore Tucker filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting completed forms to proceed without prepaying them. The order states that he was incarcerated and represented himself.

The court gave Tucker 30 days to either pay $400 in fees or submit a signed application and authorization allowing installment deductions from his prisoner account. The court also directed the Clerk to mail him the order and did not issue a summons at that time.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon warned that the action would be dismissed if Tucker did not comply within the deadline. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tucker v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-09496
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 30, 2020

Background

Theodore Tucker filed this civil action without paying the filing fees or submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. The order states that Tucker was incarcerated at the Vernon C. Bain Center and was representing himself. His complaint had initially been filed with 49 other detainees, but a magistrate judge had severed the claims and directed the Clerk to open separate cases.

Order

The court directed Tucker, within 30 days, to do one of two things: pay $400 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee, or submit the attached application and prisoner authorization forms. The authorization would allow the $350 filing fee to be deducted from his prisoner account in installments and would require certified copies of his account statements for the preceding six months. The order explains that the $50 administrative fee does not apply to a prisoner granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court directed the Clerk to mail Tucker a copy of the order and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Tucker complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and Prisoner-Strike Warning

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order also warned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and that a prisoner with three strikes generally cannot proceed without prepaying fees unless facing imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.