Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 1, 2020

Solorzano v. Yamaha Motor Finance Corporation, USA

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:20-cv-07248
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Solorzano v. Yamaha Motor Finance Corporation, USA, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled case, subject to a deadline for restoring it.

Who this affects

Henry Luis Solorzano and Yamaha Motor Finance Corporation, USA.

What happened

In Solorzano v. Yamaha Motor Finance Corporation, USA, the parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.

The court canceled the scheduled initial pretrial conference and discontinued the action without costs to either party. The case could be restored to the court’s calendar if an application was made by January 1, 2021.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no application to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Solorzano v. Yamaha Motor Finance Corporation, USA · No. 1:20-cv-07248
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Dec. 1, 2020

Background The parties notified the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Ruling The court canceled the initial pretrial conference scheduled for December 14, 2020. It ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar, provided an application to restore it was made by January 1, 2021. The court further stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Effect The order resolved the case based on the parties’ settlement in principle, subject to the stated restoration deadline.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.