Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 2, 2020

Eva's Photography, Inc. v. Rachel Katz, LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:20-cv-04663
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Eva’s Photography v. Rachel Katz, Judge Cave stayed deadlines and required new counsel after Plaintiff’s lawyer was suspended.

Who this affects

Eva’s Photography, Inc., its suspended counsel Richard Liebowitz, and the Leibowitz firm were affected. The order required Eva’s Photography to obtain new counsel and required another attorney or paralegal from the firm to serve the order and file proof of service.

What happened

In Eva’s Photography, Inc. v. Rachel Katz, LLC, Plaintiff’s counsel, Richard Liebowitz, was temporarily suspended from practicing law in the Southern District of New York while disciplinary proceedings continued.

The court stayed all deadlines for 30 days and postponed the December 8, 2020 settlement conference indefinitely. Within that 30-day period, Eva’s Photography had to obtain another lawyer from the Leibowitz firm or a lawyer outside that firm because the corporation could not represent itself. If it could not obtain counsel, the case could be dismissed for failing to pursue it.

Judge Sarah L. Cave also ordered another attorney or paralegal from Mr. Liebowitz’s firm to provide Eva’s Photography with the order and file proof that it had done so.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Eva's Photography, Inc. v. Rachel Katz, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-04663
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Dec. 2, 2020

Background

Plaintiff’s counsel, Richard Liebowitz, had been suspended from practicing law in the Southern District of New York on an interim basis while further disciplinary proceedings were pending. The opinion does not state the reason for the suspension.

Court’s Order

The court stayed all deadlines for 30 days from the order’s date. It also postponed indefinitely the settlement conference scheduled to resume on December 8, 2020.

Within 30 days, Eva’s Photography, Inc. was required to appear through either another attorney from the Leibowitz firm or an attorney outside that firm. The court stated that the corporation could not proceed without a lawyer. If it could not obtain other counsel within 30 days, the case could be dismissed for failure to prosecute, meaning failure to move the case forward.

The court further ordered an attorney or paralegal from Mr. Liebowitz’s firm, other than Mr. Liebowitz, to serve Eva’s Photography with a copy of the order by December 11, 2020, and to file proof of service by December 14, 2020.

Disposition

Judge Sarah L. Cave stayed the deadlines for 30 days and postponed the settlement conference indefinitely. The order did not dismiss the case; it stated only that dismissal could occur if Plaintiff failed to obtain counsel within the required period.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.