Shkreta v. Colonnade Management Corporation
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:20-cv-06134
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Shkreta v. Colonnade Management Corporation, Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered the parties to discuss consenting to Magistrate Judge Fox handling all further proceedings.
The parties to the case were required to discuss consenting to Magistrate Judge Fox conducting all further proceedings and to meet the specified two-week filing deadline. The order stated that declining consent would carry no adverse consequences.
What happened
In Shkreta v. Colonnade Management Corporation, the court was told that mediation had not succeeded. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The court said the case would be referred to Magistrate Judge Fox for general pretrial matters and required the parties to discuss whether they would consent to Fox conducting all further proceedings.
Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered the parties to submit a consent form within two weeks if everyone agreed, or a joint letter stating that they did not consent if anyone declined. The order also reminded the parties that most settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act must receive court approval.
The detailed version
- Shkreta v. Colonnade Management Corporation · No. 1:20-cv-06134
- Ronnie Abrams
- Dec. 8, 2020
Background
The court stated that mediation had been unsuccessful. The order does not describe the underlying claims or decide which side is legally correct.
Referral and Consent
The court stated that, by a separate order, the case would be referred to Magistrate Judge Fox for general pretrial matters. It ordered the parties to discuss whether they would voluntarily consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to having Judge Fox conduct all further proceedings, including any trial and entry of final judgment.
If all parties consented, they were required to submit a fully executed consent and reference form within two weeks of the order. If any party did not consent, the parties were required to file a joint letter within the same period stating that they did not consent, without identifying the party or parties who declined. The order stated that withholding consent would not lead to adverse consequences. If the court approved the consent form, further proceedings would occur before Judge Fox, and any appeal would go directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Additional Reminder and Disposition
Judge Ronnie Abrams also reminded the parties that, in most cases, settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act require court approval. The order was a case-management and referral order; it did not grant or deny a motion, dismiss any claim, or resolve the merits.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.