Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 14, 2020

Live Traffic Data Corp. v. Eberle Design Inc.

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:20-cv-09585
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Live Traffic Data v. Eberle Design, Judge Briccetti ordered plaintiff to choose whether to amend its complaint while defendant’s dismissal motion remained pending.

Who this affects

Live Traffic Data Corp. had to choose whether to amend its complaint; Eberle Design, Inc. received options for responding if an amended complaint was filed.

What happened

Live Traffic Data Corp. sued Eberle Design, Inc., and Eberle Design moved to dismiss the complaint on December 11, 2020.

The court required Live Traffic Data to tell the court by December 21 whether it would file an amended complaint or rely on the existing complaint.

If Live Traffic Data chose to amend, it had 14 days after notifying the court to file the amendment, and Eberle Design then had 21 days to respond. Judge Briccetti did not decide the motion to dismiss in this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Live Traffic Data Corp. v. Eberle Design Inc. · No. 7:20-cv-09585
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Dec. 14, 2020

Background

Eberle Design, Inc. moved to dismiss Live Traffic Data Corp.’s complaint on December 11, 2020.

Court’s order

The court ordered Live Traffic Data to notify the court by December 21, 2020, whether it would:

1. file an amended complaint in response to the motion to dismiss; or 2. rely on the complaint already filed.

If Live Traffic Data chose not to amend, the motion to dismiss would proceed under the regular schedule. The court also stated that it was unlikely to give Live Traffic Data another opportunity to amend to address deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed arguments in the motion.

If Live Traffic Data chose to amend, it had to file the amended complaint no later than 14 days after notifying the court of that choice. Within 21 days after the amendment, Eberle Design could answer the amended complaint, move to dismiss it, or notify the court that it would rely on its original motion to dismiss. The court said the deadlines for opposition and reply papers would otherwise be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local civil rules.

Disposition

This order did not grant or deny the motion to dismiss and did not decide the merits of the complaint. It set procedures for deciding whether the plaintiff would amend its pleading and how the defendant could respond. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti issued the order on December 14, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.