Schreiber v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:20-cv-05417
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Schreiber v. Experian, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case against Experian after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by January 15, 2021.
The order affected Plaintiff Kylie Schreiber and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. It discontinued the action as to Experian and did not rule on the claims against HSBC Bank USA, N.A., or American Express Company.
What happened
Schreiber v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. involved Plaintiff Kylie Schreiber’s notice that she and Experian had reached a settlement in principle.
The order concerned only Experian; it did not rule on the claims against HSBC Bank USA, N.A., or American Express Company. The court imposed no costs on Schreiber or Experian.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the action be discontinued as to Experian, without prejudice to restoring it if the settlement was not completed and Schreiber applied to restore the case by January 15, 2021. If no such application was made by that date, the dismissal as to Experian would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Schreiber v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-05417
- Vyskocil
- Dec. 15, 2020
Background
Plaintiff Kylie Schreiber notified the court that she and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. had reached a settlement in principle. The case also named HSBC Bank USA, N.A., and American Express Company as defendants, but this order addressed only Experian.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued as to Experian without costs to Schreiber or Experian. The order stated that the action could be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties did not execute a settlement agreement, provided an application to restore the action was made by January 15, 2021. If no such application was made by that date, the dismissal as to Experian would be with prejudice. The opinion does not state whether a final settlement agreement was later executed or whether any application to restore the action was filed.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.