Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 17, 2020

Flowers v. United States

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-09367
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Flowers v. United States, Chief Judge McMahon denied Flowers’s duplicate detention petition without prejudice and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Joe N. Flowers Jr.; the order denies his duplicative federal detention petition without prejudice and limits his ability to appeal without paying filing fees.

What happened

In Flowers v. United States, Joe N. Flowers Jr., who was incarcerated and represented himself, filed a petition challenging his detention under federal law. He had already filed an earlier petition raising the same claims, and that earlier petition was decided on its merits.

The court concluded that the new petition duplicated the earlier one and denied it without prejudice. The petition had been transferred to the Southern District of New York from the Western District of New York.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that no certificate allowing an appeal would issue and denied Flowers permission to appeal without paying filing fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Flowers v. United States · No. 1:20-cv-09367
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Dec. 17, 2020

Background

Joe N. Flowers Jr. appeared without a lawyer and was incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Otisville, New York. He filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, a federal procedure used to challenge certain aspects of a person’s detention.

Flowers had previously submitted another § 2241 petition on September 18, 2019. That earlier proceeding was decided on the merits by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on September 21, 2020. While that earlier proceeding was still pending, Flowers submitted the present petition to prison officials for mailing to the federal court in the Western District of New York. That court transferred the petition to the Southern District of New York on November 2, 2020.

Court’s analysis

The court determined that the present petition raised the same claims that had already been raised and adjudicated in the earlier proceeding. It stated that no useful purpose would be served by litigating the duplicative petition. Relying on the court’s authority to manage its docket, including staying or dismissing a suit that duplicates another federal suit, the court denied the petition without prejudice as duplicative.

Ruling and appeal provisions

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon denied the petition without prejudice. The court also ruled that a certificate of appealability would not issue because the petition did not make a substantial showing that a constitutional right had been denied. In addition, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed on appeal without paying filing fees. The Clerk was directed to mail Flowers a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.