Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 17, 2020

Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:20-cv-09928
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital, Judge McMahon dismissed the action without prejudice because Manko did not obtain required permission before filing without fees.

Who this affects

Nella Manko’s action was dismissed without prejudice because she did not obtain required permission to file without paying filing fees. The order also denied fee-free status for an appeal.

What happened

Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital was a new case filed by Nella Manko, who was representing herself. A 2013 order had barred her from filing any new case without paying filing fees unless she first obtained the court’s permission. She did not request that permission or pay the filing fees.

The court treated Manko’s filing as a request to proceed without paying fees and dismissed the action without prejudice because she had not followed the 2013 order. The court also stated that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for any appeal.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon issued the dismissal order. The ruling did not decide the underlying claims against Lenox Hill Hospital or the other defendants.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital · No. 1:20-cv-09928
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 17, 2020

Background

Nella Manko filed a new case while representing herself. The court stated that a July 11, 2013 order had barred her from filing any new action without paying filing fees unless she first obtained permission from the court. In this case, Manko did not request that permission and did not pay the filing fees. Although she labeled the complaint “fee paid,” the court confirmed with its Finance Department that the required fees had not been paid.

Ruling

The court assumed, for purposes of the order, that Manko was seeking permission to proceed without paying filing fees. Because she had not obtained the required permission before filing, the court dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to comply with the 2013 order. “Without prejudice” means the dismissal itself did not bar a later filing, although the opinion did not address the requirements for any later filing.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied Manko permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal. The court did not reach the merits of Manko’s claims against Lenox Hill Hospital or the other defendants.

Effect

The dismissal ended this action at that stage, based on the filing-fee and prior-order requirement rather than the substance of the claims. The Clerk was directed to mail Manko a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.