Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 22, 2020

Abraham v. Nationwide Credit, Inc.

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:20-cv-08723
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Abraham v. Nationwide Credit, Judge Briccetti ordered Yoel Abraham to say whether he would amend his complaint or oppose Nationwide Credit’s dismissal motion.

Who this affects

Yoel Abraham and Nationwide Credit, Inc.; the order set deadlines and procedural choices for both parties but did not decide the dismissal motion.

What happened

In Abraham v. Nationwide Credit, Inc., Nationwide Credit moved to dismiss Yoel Abraham’s complaint on December 21, 2020.

The court ordered Abraham to notify it by January 4, 2021, whether he would file an amended complaint or rely on the existing complaint. If he chose to amend, he had 14 days after notifying the court to file the amendment.

The order did not decide the motion to dismiss. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti set deadlines for the next steps and explained how Nationwide Credit could respond to an amended complaint.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Abraham v. Nationwide Credit, Inc. · No. 7:20-cv-08723
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Dec. 22, 2020

Background

Nationwide Credit, Inc. moved to dismiss Yoel Abraham’s complaint on December 21, 2020. The opinion does not describe the claims or the arguments in the dismissal motion.

Order

The court ordered Abraham to notify the court by January 4, 2021, whether he intended to file an amended complaint in response to the motion or would rely on the complaint already filed. If Abraham chose not to amend, the motion to dismiss would proceed under the regular schedule, and the court stated it was unlikely to allow another amendment to address deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed motion.

If Abraham chose to amend, he had to file the amended complaint no later than 14 days after notifying the court of that choice. Within 21 days after the amendment, Nationwide Credit could answer, file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, or notify the court that it would rely on its initial motion to dismiss. The order also stated that briefing deadlines would be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Southern District of New York’s local rules unless the court ordered otherwise.

Disposition

The court did not grant or deny the motion to dismiss. It issued a case-management order requiring Abraham to choose between amending his complaint and proceeding with the existing complaint. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.