Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 23, 2020

Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC v. Fernandez

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:20-cv-09779
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Intrepid Financial Partners v. Fernandez, Judge Swain granted permission to redact sensitive proprietary information and trade secrets from a joint filing.

Who this affects

Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC and Fernandez, the parties to the case; the ruling concerned redactions to a joint pre-hearing filing.

What happened

Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC v. Fernandez concerned the plaintiff’s request to file a redacted version of the parties’ Joint Supplemental Pre-Hearing Submission. The plaintiff said the proposed redactions covered sensitive, non-public client information and trade secrets.

The plaintiff relied on the parties’ protective order and cited cases concerning the sealing or redaction of confidential information. The defendant consented to the request.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain granted the request and allowed the proposed redaction. The order stated that docket entry 93 was resolved.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC v. Fernandez · No. 1:20-cv-09779
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 23, 2020

Background

Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC, represented by counsel, asked the court for permission to file a redacted version of the parties’ Joint Supplemental Pre-Hearing Submission. The plaintiff stated that the proposed redactions were narrowly limited to sensitive, non-public information about proprietary clients and trade secrets. It referred to the parties’ protective order and cited decisions concerning the protection of confidential information. The defendant consented to the application.

Ruling

The court granted the plaintiff’s request to file the redacted document. The order stated: “The foregoing request is granted. DE# 93 resolved.” Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.