Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 4, 2021

Schreiber v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:20-cv-05417
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Schreiber v. Experian Information Solutions, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after Schreiber reported a settlement in principle with HSBC.

Who this affects

Kylie Schreiber and the defendants—Experian Information Solutions, Inc., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., and American Express Company—were affected by the discontinuation of the action. The opinion specifically reports a settlement in principle between Schreiber and HSBC.

What happened

In Schreiber v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Plaintiff Kylie Schreiber told the court that she and Defendant HSBC Bank USA, N.A. had reached a settlement in principle.

The court cancelled the January 5, 2021 Initial Pretrial Conference and discontinued the action without costs to any party.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil allowed the action to be restored if the settlement was not executed and an application was made by February 4, 2021; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Schreiber v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-05417
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Jan. 4, 2021

Background

Plaintiff Kylie Schreiber notified the court that she and Defendant HSBC Bank USA, N.A. had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not state that a final settlement had been executed.

Court’s Action

The court cancelled the Initial Pretrial Conference scheduled for January 5, 2021, at 11:30 a.m. It ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if a settlement had not been executed and Schreiber made an application to restore the action by February 4, 2021.

The court further stated that if no such application was made by February 4, 2021, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice. The opinion does not decide the merits of Schreiber’s claims against Experian Information Solutions, Inc., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., or American Express Company.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.