Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 4, 2021

Chirse v. Edgar

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-11039
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Chirse v. Edgar, Judge McMahon transferred the constitutional-rights case to the Western District of New York because venue was improper in Manhattan.

Who this affects

The order affects DeVante Chirse and the defendants in his constitutional-rights action by moving the case from the Southern District of New York to the Western District of New York.

What happened

DeVante Chirse, who was incarcerated at Southport Correctional Facility and represented himself, brought Chirse v. Edgar under a federal civil-rights law, alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights there.

The court found that the case belonged in the Western District of New York because Chirse alleged that the defendants were assigned to Southport and that the relevant events occurred there. The court therefore transferred the action rather than deciding the constitutional claims.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the transfer, closed the Southern District case, and left any decision about allowing Chirse to proceed without paying filing fees to the receiving court. She also denied fee-free status for any appeal from the transfer order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chirse v. Edgar · No. 1:20-cv-11039
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 4, 2021

Background

DeVante Chirse, who was incarcerated at Southport Correctional Facility, brought this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that the defendants violated his federal constitutional rights at Southport. The caption identifies the defendants as J. Edgar and others.

Venue analysis

The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1391, the federal venue statute. That statute generally permits a civil action to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in certain circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction.

Chirse alleged that the defendants were all assigned to Southport and that the events underlying his claims occurred there. The court stated that he did not allege that any defendant resided in the Southern District of New York or that a substantial part of the relevant events occurred there. Southport is in Chemung County, which the court stated is in the Western District of New York. The court therefore concluded that venue was proper in the Western District under § 1391(b)(2).

Ruling

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), which permits transfer when venue is improper. The court did not decide whether the alleged constitutional violations occurred or whether Chirse’s claims had merit.

The court directed the Clerk to mail the order to Chirse, record service on the docket, and transfer the action. It stated that the receiving court would decide whether Chirse could proceed without prepaying filing fees. No summons would issue from the Southern District, and the order closed that case. Judge Colleen McMahon certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.