Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 5, 2021

Dickerson v. City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:20-cv-03893
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Issac Dickerson v. City of New York, Judge Aaron extended NYCHA’s response deadline and warned of possible dismissal if Dickerson missed the next conference.

Who this affects

Issac Dickerson, the pro se plaintiff, must comply with the scheduled conference and keep the court and defendants informed of address changes; Defendant New York City Housing Authority received an extended deadline to respond to the complaint.

What happened

Issac Dickerson v. City of New York concerns a conference at which only the defendants appeared. The court noted that Dickerson apparently had not received mailed filings and that the defendants had been unable to reach him by telephone or email.

The court extended the New York City Housing Authority’s deadline to respond to the complaint until January 22, 2021, and scheduled a telephone conference for March 5, 2021. It warned that if Dickerson did not attend, it would recommend dismissing the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The court also directed the Clerk to mail the order to Dickerson.

Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron issued the order. The order did not dismiss the case or decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dickerson v. City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-03893
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 5, 2021

Background

Issac Dickerson is proceeding without a lawyer. After a telephone conference, the court stated that only the defendants had appeared. The court noted that Dickerson apparently had not received filings mailed to him at the Fort Washington Shelter or at 1000 Blake Avenue, Brooklyn, New York. Counsel for the City of New York described efforts to contact Dickerson by telephone and email, but reported receiving no response.

Order

The court extended Defendant New York City Housing Authority’s deadline to respond to the complaint until January 22, 2021. It directed the parties to appear for a telephone conference on March 5, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., and provided the call-in information.

The court explained that Dickerson was responsible for complying with court orders, diligently prosecuting the case, and informing the court and defendants of address changes. It stated that failing to do so could support dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), which permits dismissal for failure to prosecute. The court ordered the Clerk to mail a copy of the order to Dickerson.

Potential dismissal warning

The court did not dismiss the action in this order. Instead, it stated that if Dickerson failed to appear for the March 5 conference, it would recommend to District Judge Swain that the action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

Judge and disposition

Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron issued the order. The order extended a response deadline, scheduled a conference, and warned of a possible recommendation for dismissal; it did not itself grant or deny a merits motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.