Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 13, 2021

Tatum v. City of New York

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:19-cv-02581
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Tatum v. City of New York, Judge Cronan extended service time and ordered Marshals service for Nikkal Barnes.

Who this affects

Wayne Tatum and Nikkal Barnes were directly affected; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were directed to take steps to complete service.

What happened

In Tatum v. City of New York, Wayne Tatum had permission to proceed without paying court fees, so the court and U.S. Marshals Service could handle service of the lawsuit. Earlier, the court had found good cause to extend the time to serve Nikkal Barnes and others.

The court found that good cause continued to exist for extending the time to serve Barnes. It directed the Clerk of Court to prepare the service form, issue a summons, and provide the necessary papers to the Marshals Service so Barnes could be served at the address listed in the order.

Judge John P. Cronan also directed the Clerk to mail the order to Tatum and record that mailing on the docket. Tatum must notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court stated that it may dismiss the case if he does not.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tatum v. City of New York · No. 1:19-cv-02581
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Jan. 13, 2021

Background

Wayne Tatum had been granted permission to proceed without paying court fees. In such cases, federal law and court rules require the court to direct the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint when necessary. Generally, service must be completed within 90 days after the summons is issued, although the plaintiff may request more time.

On April 21, 2020, the court found good cause to extend the service deadline for Nikkal Barnes and others. On December 1, 2020, counsel for the “City Defendants” told the court that a law firm likely to represent Barnes had provided a service address for Barnes: 306 West 94th Street, New York, New York 10025.

Court’s Action

The court found that good cause continued to exist to extend the time for serving Barnes. It instructed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Barnes, issue a summons, and give the Marshals Service the paperwork needed to serve Barnes at the listed address.

The Clerk was also directed to mail a copy of the order to Tatum and note the mailing on the docket. Tatum was required to notify the court in writing if his address changes. The court stated that it may dismiss the action if he fails to provide that notice.

Disposition

Judge John P. Cronan entered an order extending the time to serve Nikkal Barnes and directing service through the U.S. Marshals Service. The order addressed service of process and did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.