Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 14, 2021

Garcia Espindola v. Pizza Stop Corp.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:19-cv-01026
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Garcia Espindola v. Pizza Stop Corp., Judge Broderick ordered judgment under Rule 68 despite criticizing the parties’ effort to avoid review of their wage settlement.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in this Fair Labor Standards Act case were affected by the entry of judgment under their Rule 68 offer and acceptance; the case was closed.

What happened

Cesario Garcia Espindola and the other plaintiffs sued Pizza Stop Corp. and the other defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties reported reaching a settlement after mediation, then submitted an offer and acceptance of judgment under Rule 68.

The court said the parties’ sequence of actions conflicted with the purpose of a prior ruling requiring court or Department of Labor approval for many wage settlements. The court nevertheless concluded that a later Second Circuit decision required it to enter judgment under Rule 68.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered judgment entered according to the parties’ Rule 68 offer and acceptance. He also directed the Clerk to terminate open motions and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia Espindola v. Pizza Stop Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-01026
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Jan. 14, 2021

Background

The parties submitted a December 11, 2020 letter describing their proposed settlement, the circumstances surrounding it, and why they believed resolution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 was appropriate. The opinion states that the parties first reported settlement on October 15, 2020, after participating in mediation on September 9, 2020. The court then ordered them to disclose the settlement terms and explain why the settlement was a fair and reasonable compromise. Days later, the parties filed Rule 68 materials consisting of an offer and acceptance of judgment.

Legal framework

The Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law, generally requires court or Department of Labor approval of settlements because of concerns about workers’ wages and unequal bargaining power. The court noted, however, that the Second Circuit had later held that court approval is not required for Rule 68(a) offers of judgment settling Fair Labor Standards Act claims. Rule 68(a) allows a defending party to offer judgment on specified terms; if the opposing party accepts within the required period, the court clerk must enter judgment.

Court’s reasoning

Judge Vernon S. Broderick stated that the Second Circuit’s decision compelled entry of judgment. He nevertheless criticized the parties’ conduct, reasoning that reporting settlement first and filing the Rule 68 offer and acceptance afterward conflicted with the purpose of the earlier settlement-approval requirement. He warned that the current system could encourage parties to avoid that review by submitting Rule 68 materials after reaching a settlement agreement.

Disposition

The court ordered that judgment be entered in accordance with the parties’ previously filed Rule 68 offer and acceptance. The Clerk was directed to terminate any open motions and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.