Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 19, 2021

Perez v. New York City

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:20-cv-11053
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Perez v. New York City, Judge McMahon ordered payment or an IFP application from Susan Suarez, or dismissed her as a party.

Who this affects

Delailah Perez and Susan Suarez, particularly Suarez, who was required to submit an application or risk dismissal as a party.

What happened

In Perez v. New York City, Delailah Perez and Susan Suarez filed a civil action without paying the required fees. They were representing themselves, and only Perez submitted an application to proceed without paying fees in advance.

The court gave the plaintiffs 30 days to pay $402 or have Suarez complete and submit an application to proceed without prepayment. The court said no summons would issue at that time.

If Suarez failed to comply, she would be dismissed as a party. Chief Judge Colleen McMahon also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez v. New York City · No. 1:20-cv-11053
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Jan. 19, 2021

Background

Delailah Perez and Susan Suarez brought the action representing themselves. The caption also lists Perez's unborn fetus, newborn, and two minor children as plaintiffs. The complaint was submitted without the required filing fees. Perez submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees, but Suarez did not submit one.

Order

The court explained that proceeding with a civil action required either payment of $402—$350 for the filing fee and $52 for the administrative fee—or a signed application from each plaintiff requesting permission to proceed without prepayment under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Within 30 days, the plaintiffs were ordered either to pay the $402 or for Suarez to complete and submit the attached application, labeled with docket number 20-CV-11053 (CM). If the applications were granted, the plaintiffs could proceed without prepaying the fees.

The Clerk was directed to mail the order to each plaintiff and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. If Suarez complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures. If she failed to comply within the allowed time, she would be dismissed as a party.

Appeal and disposition

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order addressed the filing-fee and application requirements; it did not decide the underlying claims. Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon entered the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.