Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 20, 2021

Young v. Armored Republic LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:20-cv-06605
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Young v. Armored Republic LLC, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

The dismissal affected Lawrence Young and Armored Republic LLC. It ended the case, canceled scheduled proceedings and deadlines, and terminated open motions, while allowing a possible request to reopen or to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement within 30 days.

What happened

In Young v. Armored Republic LLC, the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

The court canceled scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, and directed the clerk to close the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni allowed the parties to ask to reopen the case within 30 days for good cause and explained how they could ask the court to retain power to enforce their settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Young v. Armored Republic LLC · No. 1:20-cv-06605
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Jan. 20, 2021

Background

On January 19, 2021, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The order does not describe the underlying claims or the terms of that agreement.

Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The order permitted the parties to apply to reopen the case within 30 days. The application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement, and the order warned that a late application or one without a showing of good cause could be denied on that basis. The parties could also ask the court to retain jurisdiction—the court’s authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, but they had to submit the agreement and request that authority within the same 30-day period.

Judge’s Ruling

Judge Valerie Caproni entered the dismissal and related directives. The order resolved the case procedurally based on the parties’ reported agreement; it did not decide the underlying legal claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.