Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 20, 2021

Alexander v. Private Protective Services, Inc.

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:19-cv-10004
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Alexander v. Private Protective Services, Inc., Judge Aaron ordered Jeriel Alexander to pay $40 for service through New York’s Secretary of State after repeated failed service attempts.

Who this affects

Jeriel Alexander was required to pay the $40 service fee and provide the required documents by February 20, 2021 if he wished to continue the case. Private Protective Services, Inc. remained unserved, and the U.S. Marshals Service was directed to act if Alexander complied.

What happened

In Alexander v. Private Protective Services, Inc., the court addressed repeated unsuccessful attempts to serve the defendant, Private Protective Services, Inc., with the lawsuit.

The U.S. Marshals Service tried several addresses and also tried to serve the company through its chief executive officer, but each attempt failed. Because the defendant is a corporation, the court said Alexander could instead arrange service through the New York Secretary of State by paying a required $40 fee.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron ordered Alexander to send the $40 check and a copy of the order to the Marshals Service by February 20, 2021, if he wished to continue the case. The order did not dismiss the case but said Judge Aaron would recommend dismissal for failure to prosecute if Alexander did not meet the deadline.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Alexander v. Private Protective Services, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-10004
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Jan. 20, 2021

Background

Jeriel Alexander was proceeding in the action without prepayment of filing fees. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the court had made efforts to have the U.S. Marshals Service serve Private Protective Services, Inc. The opinion identifies four unsuccessful efforts:

- On December 3, 2019, service failed because the address was insufficient. - On March 11, 2020, service at an updated address failed after building security said the defendant had moved out in November 2019. - On November 2, 2020, service at another updated address failed because the Marshals Service was unable to serve the defendant at that address. - On December 16, 2020, service through the defendant’s chief executive officer failed because the officer could not be located at the provided address.

Court’s Analysis

Because Private Protective Services, Inc. is a corporation, the court explained that Alexander could serve it personally through the New York Secretary of State, which is identified as the statutory service agent for a business corporation. That method required a $40 statutory fee. The court stated that it could not pay that fee on Alexander’s behalf despite his status as a litigant proceeding without prepayment of fees.

Order

The court ordered that, if Alexander wished to pursue the case, he had to mail the Marshals Service a $40 check payable to the Department of State and a copy of the order by February 20, 2021. If the Marshals Service received those items, it would notify the court so the court could enter an appropriate order concerning service through the New York Secretary of State.

The order did not dismiss the case. It stated that if Alexander failed to send the required check and order by the deadline, Judge Stewart D. Aaron would recommend to Judge Oetken that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Alexander a copy of the order, and chambers was directed to send a copy to the Marshals Service.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.