Windley v. Westchester County
- 7:19-cv-04858
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Windley v. Westchester County, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.
Ian Windley’s complaint was dismissed with prejudice after the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The case was closed.
What happened
In Windley v. Westchester County, the defendants moved to dismiss Ian Windley’s complaint. The judgment does not describe the claims or the defendants’ arguments.
The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. It stated that the reasons were explained in a memorandum opinion and order dated January 27, 2021.
The court dismissed the complaint with prejudice because any amendment would be futile and closed the case. The opinion does not identify an individual judge; the judgment was signed by Clerk of Court Ruby J. Krajick.
The detailed version
- Windley v. Westchester County · No. 7:19-cv-04858
- Jan. 28, 2021
Background
Ian Windley sued Westchester County and other defendants. The judgment itself does not state the claims, the underlying events, or the parties’ arguments. It refers to a memorandum opinion and order dated January 27, 2021, but that document is not included here.
Ruling
The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which asks the court to end a case based on the complaint and applicable legal rules. The court granted that motion. It dismissed Windley’s complaint with prejudice, meaning the judgment bars amendment of the complaint in this case. The court stated that amendment would be futile and closed the case.
Disposition
The defendants’ motion to dismiss was granted. The complaint was dismissed with prejudice, and the case was closed. The judgment was dated January 28, 2021, and signed by Clerk of Court Ruby J. Krajick; the opinion text does not identify the individual judge who issued the underlying ruling.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.