Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 4, 2021

Ramales Perez v. East Side Top Cleaners LLC

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:20-cv-05509
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ramales Perez v. East Side Top Cleaners, Judge Liman required a proposed Fair Labor Standards Act settlement to undergo fairness review.

Who this affects

The parties to the Fair Labor Standards Act action, including the plaintiff, the defendants, plaintiff’s counsel regarding any fee request, and others covered by the proposed settlement.

What happened

In Ramales Perez v. East Side Top Cleaners LLC, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle in a wage case brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The court ordered the parties to submit the settlement agreement and a joint explanation by March 4, 2021. The explanation had to address why the settlement was fair and reasonable, as well as any confidentiality, non-disparagement, release, incentive-payment, and attorney-fee provisions. The court also required supporting records for any requested attorney fees and scheduled a fairness hearing for March 11, 2021; it canceled the previously scheduled status conference.

Judge Lewis J. Liman did not rule on whether to approve the settlement in this order. Instead, he required the materials needed for the court’s fairness review and warned that inadequate documentation could lead to rejection of the proposed fee award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ramales Perez v. East Side Top Cleaners LLC · No. 1:20-cv-05509
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Feb. 4, 2021

Background

Juana Ramales Perez brought this action individually and on behalf of others similarly situated under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law. The parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.

Court’s Order

The court explained that, under Second Circuit precedent, settlements in Fair Labor Standards Act cases—including proposed attorney-fee awards—must be reviewed for fairness. The court ordered the parties to submit the settlement agreement and a joint letter by March 4, 2021. The letter had to explain the basis for the proposed settlement and why it was fair and reasonable, with reference to the factors identified in Wolinsky v. Scholastic, Inc.

The parties also had to address any confidentiality provisions, non-disparagement provisions, releases, incentive payments to the plaintiff, and attorney-fee award to plaintiff’s counsel. For any fee request, the court required adequate supporting documentation, ordinarily including contemporaneous records showing each attorney’s date of work, hours spent, and the nature of the work. The court warned that insufficient documentation could result in rejection of the proposed fee award.

The court canceled the status conference scheduled for February 4, 2021, and scheduled a fairness hearing for March 11, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. The order required the parties to participate by telephone.

Disposition and Significance

The order required further submissions and scheduled a fairness hearing; it did not state that the settlement was approved. Judge Lewis J. Liman’s order addressed the process for reviewing the proposed settlement and fee award, not the merits of the underlying wage claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.