Corwell v. Westchester County
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:19-cv-03049
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
Corwell v. Westchester County: Judge Briccetti dismissed the case with prejudice after Corwell failed to update his address or follow court orders.
The dismissal ended Ziare Corwell's case against the individual defendants, including LaFonda Spaulding, Sgt. Davis, Officer Cardillo, Officer Cozier, Officer Adames, Correctional Officer Schilliro, Officer Beltran, and Correctional Officer Melendez. The court's order also denied Corwell permission to appeal without paying the filing fee.
What happened
In Corwell v. Westchester County, the plaintiff, who was representing himself, had brought claims arising from his detention at Westchester County Jail. The court had allowed one excessive-force claim to continue and dismissed the other claims.
After the plaintiff was released from custody, defendants told the court that he had not provided a current address and could not be reached for discovery. The court ordered him to update his address by February 4, 2021, and warned that failing to do so could lead to dismissal.
The plaintiff did not update his address or otherwise communicate with the court after August 2020. Judge Briccetti concluded that he had abandoned the case and dismissed it with prejudice for failing to prosecute and comply with court orders. The court also denied him permission to appeal without paying filing fees.
The detailed version
- Corwell v. Westchester County · No. 7:19-cv-03049
- Vincent Briccetti
- Feb. 9, 2021
Background
Ziare Corwell filed the action while he was a pretrial detainee at Westchester County Jail. He was proceeding without a lawyer and without paying the filing fee. The court repeatedly notified him that he had to report any address change in writing and that the case could be dismissed if he failed to do so.
Defendants moved to dismiss Corwell's amended complaint. Corwell did not oppose the motion or request more time, even after the court extended his deadline and warned that the motion would be treated as unopposed. On July 13, 2020, the court granted in part and denied in part the motion. It allowed Corwell's Fourteenth Amendment excessive-force claim to proceed against the individual defendants identified in that order and dismissed the other claims.
Failure to Update Address
Defense counsel later informed the court that Corwell had been transferred and then released from custody, had not updated his address, and could not be contacted for pretrial discovery. The court ordered Corwell to provide his current address in writing by February 4, 2021. The order warned that failure to do so could result in dismissal for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders. Corwell did not provide an updated address and had not communicated with the court since August 2020.
Ruling
Judge Briccetti concluded that Corwell had abandoned the case. Applying the factors used for dismissals based on failure to prosecute, the court dismissed the case with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or comply with court orders. The Clerk was directed to close the case. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Corwell permission to appeal without paying the filing fee.
Classification
This is a procedural order because the court dismissed the case for failure to prosecute and comply with court orders without deciding the merits of the remaining excessive-force claim.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.