Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 17, 2021

Jones v. Westchester County Department of Corrections

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-01016
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Jones v. Westchester County Department of Corrections, Judge McMahon dismissed the duplicate complaint without prejudice because an identical case was pending.

Who this affects

Steven A. Jones, Jr.; this case was dismissed without prejudice, while his identical pending action under docket number 20-CV-8542 (PMH) was unaffected by this order.

What happened

Steven A. Jones, Jr. brought Jones v. Westchester County Department of Corrections as a self-represented lawsuit under a federal civil-rights statute, alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights.

The court found that Jones had already filed an identical lawsuit against the same defendants and claims, which remained pending under docket number 20-CV-8542 (PMH). It dismissed this case without prejudice to that pending action and did not charge Jones the $350 filing fee for this case.

Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Jones permission to appeal without paying the required costs.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jones v. Westchester County Department of Corrections · No. 1:21-cv-01016
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Feb. 17, 2021

Background

Steven A. Jones, Jr., who was incarcerated in the Westchester County Department of Corrections, filed this self-represented action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that the defendants violated his constitutional rights. The defendants named in the complaint were the Westchester County Department of Corrections; Joseph K. Spano, Commissioner of Corrections; George Latimer, County Executive of Department of Corrections; and Herbert Stoddard, identified as a physician and Wellpath representative.

Reason for Dismissal

The court stated that Jones had previously filed an identical complaint against the same defendants asserting the same claims. That earlier action was pending in the same court under docket number 20-CV-8542 (PMH). Because this case duplicated the pending action, the court concluded that filing and litigating it would serve no useful purpose.

Rulings

The court dismissed this complaint without prejudice to Jones’s pending action under docket number 20-CV-8542 (PMH). Because the court believed Jones may have filed the duplicate complaint by mistake, it directed that he not be charged the $350 filing fee for this action and that funds not be deducted or reserved from his prison trust account for this action.

Judge Colleen McMahon also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the required costs. The opinion does not decide whether Jones’s constitutional claims have merit.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.