Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 18, 2021

Molina v. Harvard Maintenance

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:20-cv-10993
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureEmploymentPro Se
In one sentence

In Molina v. Harvard Maintenance, Judge Schofield extended service time and ordered Marshals Service assistance for Molina’s fee-waived employment-discrimination case.

Who this affects

Iris Molina, who was permitted to proceed without paying filing fees, receives additional time and court-assisted service of process; Harvard Maintenance is the defendant to be served.

What happened

In Molina v. Harvard Maintenance, Iris Molina, representing herself, alleges that her employer discriminated against her because of her sex and national origin under federal and New York law.

The court extended Molina’s deadline to serve the summons and complaint to 90 days after the summons is issued. Because she was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees, the court directed the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Harvard Maintenance.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield also directed the Clerk of Court to issue the summons and service paperwork, and warned that Molina must notify the court of any address change. The order did not decide whether her discrimination claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Molina v. Harvard Maintenance · No. 1:20-cv-10993
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Feb. 18, 2021

Background

Iris Molina brings this self-represented action against Harvard Maintenance under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the New York State Human Rights Law. She alleges that her employer discriminated against her based on sex and national origin. The court had previously granted her permission to proceed without paying filing fees.

Service of Process

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) generally requires a plaintiff to serve the summons and complaint within 90 days after filing the complaint. The order explains that a plaintiff proceeding without paying filing fees cannot serve the papers until the court reviews the complaint and orders a summons issued.

The court extended Molina’s service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued. It also stated that Molina may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to complete service. If service is not completed within that period, the order says Molina should ask for an extension of time.

Court’s Directives

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Harvard Maintenance, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order also directed the Clerk to mail Molina a copy of the order and an information package.

Molina must notify the court in writing if her address changes. The order states that the court may dismiss the action if she fails to do so. The order concerns service and case administration; it does not decide the merits of Molina’s discrimination allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.