Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 22, 2021

Cruz v. Beignet, Inc.

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:17-cv-09528-RWL
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Cruz v. Beignet, Judge Lehrburger approved the parties’ wage-settlement agreement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Carlos Cruz, Beignet, Inc., the other defendants, and the parties to the settlement agreement.

What happened

Cruz v. Beignet, Inc. was a damages lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement agreement.

The court reviewed the agreement and considered the risks and costs of continuing the case, possible recovery, the bargaining process, attorney’s fees, and potential fraud or collusion. It found the agreement fair and reasonable.

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger approved the settlement and dismissed the case in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court also directed the clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cruz v. Beignet, Inc. · No. 1:17-cv-09528-RWL
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
Feb. 22, 2021

Background

Carlos Cruz brought an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law, and the New York Labor Law against Beignet, Inc. and other defendants. The parties submitted a joint request for approval of their fully executed settlement agreement.

Settlement Review

The court explained that a federal court must determine whether a settlement in a Fair Labor Standards Act case is fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiation rather than employer overreaching. The court had helped mediate the case and reviewed the settlement agreement and the parties’ letter.

In evaluating the agreement, the court considered the prior proceedings, the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the case, the possible range of recovery, whether the agreement resulted from arm’s-length bargaining between experienced counsel or the parties, the attorney’s fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion. The court also noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions, narrowly limited the release to wage-and-hour claims, and provided attorney’s fees within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range.

Ruling

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger found the settlement agreement fair and reasonable and approved it. Because the case had been resolved by settlement, the court dismissed and discontinued it in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court directed the clerk to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.