Edwards v. The Servicemaster Company, LLC
- Robert Lehrburger
- 1:20-cv-06124
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Edwards v. The Servicemaster Company, LLC, Judge Lehrburger approved the wage-settlement agreement and dismissed the case with prejudice.
The plaintiffs and defendants in this Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law wage-and-hour action; the case was closed under the approved settlement.
What happened
Edwards v. The Servicemaster Company, LLC involved claims for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement agreement.
The court reviewed the agreement and the parties’ letter, considering the risks and costs of continuing the case, possible recovery, negotiations, attorneys’ fees, and potential fraud or collusion. It found the settlement fair and reasonable, noting that it had no confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions and that the release was limited to wage-and-hour claims.
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger approved the settlement and dismissed and discontinued the case in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.
The detailed version
- Edwards v. The Servicemaster Company, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-06124
- Robert Lehrburger
- Apr. 21, 2021
Background
The plaintiffs brought an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law, and the New York Labor Law. The parties submitted a joint request for approval of their fully executed settlement agreement.
Settlement Review
Under Second Circuit precedent, a federal court must review an agreement settling Fair Labor Standards Act claims to determine whether it is fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than employer overreaching. The court stated that it had helped mediate the action and carefully reviewed the settlement agreement and the parties’ letter.
The court considered, among other things, prior proceedings, the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the action, the possible range of recovery, whether experienced counsel or the parties negotiated at arm’s length, the attorneys’ fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion. The court also noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality restrictions or non-disparagement provisions, narrowly limited the release to wage-and-hour claims, and provided attorneys’ fees within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range.
Ruling
The court found the settlement agreement fair and reasonable and approved it. Because the case was resolved by settlement, Judge Robert W. Lehrburger ordered it dismissed and discontinued in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.