Mansaray v. Krous Security Service
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:20-cv-01415
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Mansaray v. Kraus Security Systems, Judge Abrams dismissed the case with prejudice after Mansaray missed the deadline to amend his complaint.
Mohamed K. Mansaray, Kraus Security Systems, and Alfred Robinson.
What happened
Mohamed K. Mansaray sued Kraus Security Systems and Alfred Robinson, identified in the caption as a security director. The court had previously granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss and allowed Mansaray to file an amended complaint.
The court set February 19, 2021, as the deadline for filing the amended complaint. No amended complaint was filed by that date.
Judge Ronnie Abrams dismissed the action with prejudice, directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment for the defendants, and ordered the case closed.
The detailed version
- Mansaray v. Krous Security Service · No. 1:20-cv-01415
- Ronnie Abrams
- Mar. 1, 2021
Background
On January 19, 2021, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss Mansaray’s complaint. The court allowed Mansaray to file an amended complaint to correct the deficiencies identified in the earlier opinion and order. The deadline was February 19, 2021.
Ruling
Because no amended complaint was filed by the deadline, the court dismissed the action with prejudice. The court directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment for the defendants and close the case.
Classification
This is a procedural order because the court dismissed the action after the plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by the court-ordered deadline.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.