Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 26, 2021

Romero v. Curlmix Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:20-cv-07664
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Romero v. Curlmix, Inc., Judge Abrams granted Curlmix an extension to answer or move until April 16, 2021.

Who this affects

Curlmix, Inc., whose deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint was extended to April 16, 2021.

What happened

Romero v. Curlmix, Inc. is a case in which the defendant requested more time to respond to the complaint.

Kim Lewis, identified as Curlmix’s CEO, asked for time to obtain a lawyer and to answer the complaint or otherwise respond. Romero agreed to the request.

Judge Ronnie Abrams granted the request and extended Curlmix’s deadline to April 16, 2021. She also reminded Curlmix that a corporation must appear in court through a lawyer.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Romero v. Curlmix Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-07664
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Feb. 26, 2021

Background

The court received a letter from Kim Lewis, the CEO of Curlmix, Inc., requesting an extension of time to obtain counsel and answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint. Plaintiff Josue Romero consented to the request.

Ruling

Judge Ronnie Abrams granted the request. The court extended Curlmix’s deadline to answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint to April 16, 2021.

The court did not set a separate deadline for Curlmix to obtain counsel. Judge Abrams reminded Ms. Lewis that a corporation may not appear in a lawsuit against it except through an attorney.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.