Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 25, 2021

Cadena v. Capital One Bank, National Association

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:21-cv-01174
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Cadena v. Capital One Bank, Judge Caproni dismissed Kevin Cadena’s case against Equifax with prejudice after the parties reported a settlement.

Who this affects

Equifax Information Services, LLC was dismissed from the case with prejudice. The order did not dispose of the claims against Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, or TransUnion LLC.

What happened

In Cadena v. Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, Kevin Cadena told the court that he and Equifax Information Services, LLC had reached an agreement in principle and were finalizing a confidential settlement. He said he would later file a formal dismissal agreement.

Cadena asked that Equifax be excused from future court appearances and deadlines while the settlement was completed. The notice concerned Equifax only; the order did not resolve the claims against Capital One Bank or TransUnion LLC.

Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the case against Equifax dismissed with prejudice and directed the clerk to terminate Equifax as a defendant. The parties had 30 days to ask to reopen the case for good cause or to ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cadena v. Capital One Bank, National Association · No. 1:21-cv-01174
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Feb. 25, 2021

Background

Plaintiff Kevin Cadena filed a notice stating that he and Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC had reached an agreement in principle and were finalizing a confidential settlement agreement. Cadena stated that he would file a stipulation of dismissal after the settlement terms were completed. He asked that Equifax be excused from future appearances and deadlines until the matter was dismissed.

The notice was titled as applying to Equifax only. The case caption also listed Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, and TransUnion LLC as defendants, but this order addressed only Equifax.

Ruling

The court ordered that the case against Equifax Information Services, LLC was dismissed with prejudice. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate Equifax as a defendant. The order allowed the parties to apply within 30 days to reopen the case as to Equifax, but any application had to show good cause. Requests filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause could be denied on that basis alone.

The court also stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—meaning authority—to enforce the settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period. The order did not state a disposition for the claims against Capital One Bank or TransUnion LLC.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.