Hunter v. DOJ - US Homeland Security
- Laura Swain
- 1:21-cv-01817
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Hunter v. DOJ – US Homeland Security, Judge McMahon ordered payment or an IFP application within 30 days, without deciding the case.
Jason T. Hunter, who filed the action without a lawyer, must either pay the required fees or submit the required forms within 30 days; the order did not decide the claims against DOJ – US HOMELAND SECURITY.
What happened
Jason T. Hunter v. DOJ – US Homeland Security is a case brought by Jason T. Hunter without a lawyer. The opinion says he was held at Treasure Coast Forensic Treatment Center and filed the action without paying the fees or submitting the required forms.
The court gave Hunter 30 days to either pay the filing fees or submit a signed application to proceed without paying the fees upfront, along with authorization for deductions from his account. The court said no summons would issue yet and warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the action.
Judge Colleen McMahon issued the order on March 3, 2021. The order did not decide the claims against the Department of Justice—U.S. Homeland Security and denied payment-free status for any appeal from the order.
The detailed version
- Hunter v. DOJ - US Homeland Security · No. 1:21-cv-01817
- Laura Swain
- Mar. 3, 2021
Background
Jason T. Hunter filed this civil action without a lawyer. The opinion states that he was being held at Treasure Coast Forensic Treatment Center in Indiantown, Florida. He submitted the complaint without paying the required fees and without a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees, called an IFP application, or a prisoner authorization.
Fee and filing requirements
The court explained that a prisoner bringing a civil action must either pay the filing and administrative fees or submit the forms required to request IFP status. The opinion first describes the total fees as $402: a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee. It later directs Hunter to pay $400, creating an inconsistency within the order. The order explains that, if IFP status is granted, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The prisoner authorization permits those deductions and requires certified copies of account statements for the prior six months.
Order
Within 30 days of the order, Hunter was required to pay the fees or submit the attached IFP application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 21-CV-1817 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail him the order and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The order states that, if Hunter complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures; if he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. The order also cautioned that a later dismissal as frivolous or for failure to state a claim could count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The court did not reach the merits of Hunter's claims against the defendant.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.