Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 3, 2021

Simmons v. City of Mount Vernon

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:19-cv-10388
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Simmons v. City of Mount Vernon, Judge Briccetti ordered counsel to file an appearance and denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

Who this affects

Terri Simmons and Annette M. Totten were affected by the filing deadline and the denial of fee-free appeal status. The order also directed that copies be mailed to them.

What happened

In Simmons v. City of Mount Vernon, the court received an amended complaint dated February 26, 2021, signed by both Terri Simmons and Annette M. Totten, Esq.

The court ordered Ms. Totten to file a formal notice of appearance electronically by March 10, 2021.

Judge Briccetti also ruled that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free appeal status. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Simmons v. City of Mount Vernon · No. 7:19-cv-10388
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Mar. 3, 2021

Background

The court received an amended complaint dated February 26, 2021. The amended complaint was signed by both Terri Simmons and Annette M. Totten, Esq.

Order

The court ordered Ms. Totten to electronically file a formal notice of appearance by March 10, 2021. A notice of appearance is a formal filing showing that an attorney represents a party in the case.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied in forma pauperis status for purposes of an appeal, meaning the plaintiff could not use that status to appeal without paying the required fees. Chambers would mail a copy of the order to the plaintiff and Ms. Totten.

Disposition

This was a procedural order concerning counsel's formal appearance and appeal-fee status. The order did not decide the merits of the claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.