Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 8, 2021

Baker Hughes Energy Services LLC v. International Engineering & Construction…

Full caption

Baker Hughes Energy Services LLC v. International Engineering & Construction S.A.

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:21-cv-01961
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureArbitration
In one sentence

In Baker Hughes Energy Services v. International Engineering, Judge Furman set deadlines and service requirements for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners seeking confirmation of the arbitration award and the respondents who may oppose the petition.

What happened

In Baker Hughes Energy Services LLC v. International Engineering & Construction S.A., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award.

The court ordered the petitioners to file any additional supporting materials by March 15, 2021. Respondents’ opposition was due March 29, and the petitioners’ reply was due April 5.

Judge Jesse M. Furman also required the petitioners to serve the petition, supporting papers, and the order electronically and by overnight mail, and to file proof of service. The order did not decide whether the award would be confirmed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Baker Hughes Energy Services LLC v. International Engineering & Construction… · No. 1:21-cv-01961
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Mar. 8, 2021

Background

On March 8, 2021, Baker Hughes Energy Services LLC and the other petitioners filed a petition seeking confirmation of an arbitration award against International Engineering & Construction S.A. and the other respondents. The opinion states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment.

Court’s Order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting their petition by March 15, 2021. Any opposition from the respondents was due March 29, 2021, and any reply from the petitioners was due April 5, 2021.

The court also ordered the petitioners to serve the petition, all supporting papers, and the order on the respondents electronically and by overnight mail no later than March 15, 2021. The petitioners had to file an affidavit confirming service by March 16, 2021.

Disposition

Judge Jesse M. Furman issued a scheduling and service order. The opinion does not state whether the court confirmed or denied the arbitration award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.