Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 10, 2021

Baez v. Cayuga Home for Children

Judge
Sarah Cave
Docket
1:20-cv-02912
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In Baez v. Cayuga Home for Children, Judge Cave granted the parties’ request to extend the settlement-materials deadline to March 24, 2021.

Who this affects

The twelve plaintiffs, Cayuga Home for Children, and the parties’ counsel were affected by the extended deadline for submitting settlement materials.

What happened

Baez v. Cayuga Home for Children is a wage-and-hour case involving twelve plaintiffs and Cayuga Home for Children. The parties were finalizing a settlement and preparing materials for court review.

The parties jointly requested a two-week extension, through March 24, 2021, to submit the settlement materials. They stated that this was their first extension request and would not affect other deadlines.

Judge Sarah L. Cave granted the extension and directed the Clerk of Court to close ECF No. 37.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Baez v. Cayuga Home for Children · No. 1:20-cv-02912
Judge
Sarah Cave
Date
Mar. 10, 2021

Background

Baez v. Cayuga Home for Children is a wage-and-hour case. The opinion text is a joint letter from the parties’ counsel concerning twelve plaintiffs. The parties were finalizing a settlement agreement and preparing a joint submission asking the Court to review and approve the agreement and supporting materials.

Request

The parties requested a two-week extension, through and including March 24, 2021, to submit the settlement materials. They stated that this was their first request for an extension and that no other dates or deadlines would be affected.

Ruling

Judge Sarah L. Cave granted the requested extension. The Court also directed the Clerk of Court to close ECF No. 37. The provided text does not state whether the settlement was ultimately approved.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.