Brigmohan v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:19-cv-06720
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Brigmohan v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc., Judge Vyskocil dismissed the action after settlement, allowing restoration by April 23, 2021.
Shamnarine Brigmohan, A. Duie Pyle, Inc., and Alexander Coyne; the action was discontinued based on the parties’ settlement in principle.
What happened
Shamnarine Brigmohan sued A. Duie Pyle, Inc. and Alexander Coyne. The opinion does not describe the claims.
The parties told the court they had reached a settlement in principle. The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and allowed either side to ask to restore it to the court’s calendar by April 23, 2021.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Brigmohan v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-06720
- Vyskocil
- Mar. 26, 2021
Background
Shamnarine Brigmohan brought this action against A. Duie Pyle, Inc. and Alexander Coyne. The opinion does not state the claims or the underlying facts.
Settlement and disposition
The parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by April 23, 2021. If no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Ruling
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal on March 26, 2021. The order did not decide the merits of the parties’ claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.