Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 29, 2021

Angeles v. Heavenly Goddess Spa Parties, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:20-cv-10168
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Angeles v. Heavenly Goddess Spa Parties, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs, allowing a 30-day reopening request.

Who this affects

The dismissal ended Jenisa Angeles’s case against Heavenly Goddess Spa Parties, Inc. The court did not state the settlement’s terms or the effect on other people represented by the action.

What happened

In Angeles v. Heavenly Goddess Spa Parties, Inc., the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the agreement’s terms.

The court canceled all scheduled conferences and deadlines. It also terminated all open motions and closed the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The parties could ask to reopen the case within 30 days by showing good cause; they could also ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement by submitting the agreement and a separate request within that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Angeles v. Heavenly Goddess Spa Parties, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-10168
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Mar. 29, 2021

Background

Jenisa Angeles brought the case on behalf of herself and others similarly situated against Heavenly Goddess Spa Parties, Inc. The opinion states that, on March 26, 2021, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. It does not provide the settlement’s terms or explain the underlying claims.

Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The court allowed the parties to apply to reopen the case within 30 days, but any application had to show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement. The court stated that a request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause could be denied on that basis alone.

The court also explained that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction—meaning authority to enforce the settlement agreement—they had to submit the agreement under Rule 6.A of the court’s Individual Practices and request an order expressly retaining jurisdiction, both within the same 30-day period.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.