Ramos v. Saul
- Analisa Torres
- 1:19-cv-10616
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Ramos v. Saul, Judge Torres granted remand to the Social Security Commissioner and denied the parties’ cross-motions as moot.
Madeline Ramos and Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security; the matter was remanded to the Commissioner.
What happened
In Ramos v. Saul, the court considered a Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox. No party objected to that recommendation.
The court found no clear error, adopted the recommendation in full, and granted Madeline Ramos’s motion to remand. It sent the matter back to the Commissioner under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), denied the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings as moot, and closed the case.
Judge Analisa Torres issued the order on March 29, 2021. The opinion does not explain the underlying reason for the recommended remand.
The detailed version
- Ramos v. Saul · No. 1:19-cv-10616
- Analisa Torres
- Mar. 29, 2021
Background
The court received a Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox. The opinion states that the parties filed no objections.
Court’s Review
Because there were no objections, Judge Torres reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error and found none. The court then adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
Rulings
The court granted Madeline Ramos’s motion to remand and remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Social Security under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The court denied as moot the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the listed motions and close the case.
The opinion does not provide the underlying reasoning for the recommended remand.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.