Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 30, 2021

Alexander v. Royce

Docket
1:20-cv-01487
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Alexander v. Royce, the court denied the petition, denied appeal-related fee-free status, and closed the case.

Who this affects

The judgment directly affects Devin Alexander, whose petition was denied and whose fee-free status for an appeal was denied. It also closes the case involving Mark Royce and the other named defendants.

What happened

In Alexander v. Royce, Devin Alexander petitioned against Mark Royce, identified as superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility, and other defendants. The provided judgment does not explain the petition’s legal basis or the underlying facts.

The judgment states that, for reasons given in an Opinion and Order dated March 30, 2021, the petition was denied. That underlying opinion is not included in the provided text.

The court also determined that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, denied fee-free status for an appeal, and closed the case. No judge is identified in the provided judgment; it is signed by the clerk of court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Alexander v. Royce · No. 1:20-cv-01487
Date
Mar. 30, 2021

What the Provided Judgment Says

The judgment identifies Devin Alexander as the petitioner and Mark Royce, superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility, and other defendants. It states that the court’s reasons appear in an Opinion and Order dated March 30, 2021, but that Opinion and Order is not included in the provided text.

Rulings

The court denied the petition. The judgment does not state whether that denial was based on the merits, a procedural issue, or another ground.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal and closed the case.

Judge and Signature

No judge is named in the provided judgment. The document is dated March 30, 2021, and is signed by Ruby J. Krajick, Clerk of Court, through Deputy Clerk HK Mango.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.