Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 16, 2021

Rodriguez v. Kiara Foods Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:20-cv-07615
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Rodriguez v. Kiara Foods, Judge Caproni extended the parties’ settlement-filing deadline to May 6, 2021, and set a May 11 conference if they did not file.

Who this affects

Dario Rodriguez, Kiara Foods, Inc., Jesus Perez, and their counsel were affected by the extended settlement-filing deadline and conditional conference date.

What happened

Dario Rodriguez v. Kiara Foods Inc. concerns Rodriguez’s allegations that the defendants violated the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties were preparing a settlement-approval filing, but Rodriguez was traveling outside the United States and could not sign the agreement immediately.

The court extended the parties’ deadline to file a letter motion and accompanying settlement agreement to May 6, 2021. If Rodriguez could not sign by then, the parties could file the final agreement for approval before he signed it. If nothing was filed by May 6, the court ordered a conference for May 11, 2021, at 3:00 p.m.

Judge Valerie Caproni entered this scheduling order on April 16, 2021. The order extended the filing deadline but did not approve the settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rodriguez v. Kiara Foods Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-07615
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Apr. 16, 2021

Background

Dario Rodriguez sued Kiara Foods, Inc., doing business as Manolo Tapas Restaurant, and Jesus Perez. He alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The court had directed the parties to submit a motion for approval of their settlement agreement by April 18, 2021. The parties jointly requested more time because Rodriguez was traveling outside the United States and was expected to be unable to sign the agreement until approximately May 4, 2021. The letter also stated that plaintiff’s counsel expected to take leave beginning in mid-May to care for the counsel’s spouse and newborn child.

Court’s Action

The court extended the parties’ time to file a letter motion and accompanying settlement agreement to May 6, 2021. If the parties could not obtain Rodriguez’s signature by that date, the court permitted them to file the final settlement agreement for approval before he signed it. If no letter or stipulation was filed by May 6, the court ordered a conference for May 11, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 443 of the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse. The order did not approve or reject the settlement.

Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni granted the requested scheduling relief in the form stated in the endorsed order: the parties’ filing deadline was extended to May 6, 2021, with a conditional conference date if they did not file by then.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.