Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Tiger…
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. Tiger Contracting Corp.
- George Daniels
- 1:20-cv-10099
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Drywall Tapers v. Tiger Contracting, Judge Daniels granted summary judgment confirming an arbitration award against Tiger.
The ruling affected the petitioning union and benefit-fund trustees, Tiger Contracting Corp., union member Michelle Black, and the entities identified in the arbitration award as recipients of payments or fines.
What happened
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 and the trustees of its benefit funds asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Tiger Contracting Corp. Tiger did not appear in the case.
The award required Tiger to pay $66,463.25 in benefits, $334.74 in wages on behalf of union member Michelle Black, and $13,000 in fines. The Joint Trade Board found that Tiger violated its collective bargaining agreement by failing to submit reports and benefit contributions and by discriminating against a job steward.
Judge George B. Daniels granted the petitioners’ unopposed motion for summary judgment, confirming the arbitration award, and directed the Clerk to close the motions and the case.
The detailed version
- Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Tiger… · No. 1:20-cv-10099
- George Daniels
- Apr. 29, 2021
Background
The petitioners moved for summary judgment seeking confirmation of an arbitration award issued by the Joint Trade Board. The award directed Tiger Contracting Corp. to pay $66,463.25 in benefits to the Local 1974 Benefit Funds, $334.74 in wages on behalf of union member Michelle Black, and $13,000 in fines to the Joint Board of the Drywall Taping Industry. The opinion states that Tiger did not appear in the action.
Court’s Analysis
The court explained that confirmation of an arbitration award on summary judgment cannot rest only on the opposing party’s failure to respond. The court must consider the record, including the arbitration agreement and the award, and determine whether a basis for the arbitrator’s decision can be inferred from the facts.
The Joint Trade Board found that Tiger violated its collective bargaining agreement by failing to submit remittance reports and benefit contributions and by discriminating against a job steward. The court found that the arbitrator’s finding was undisputed and supported by the record. Because no material factual dispute remained and the basis for the award could be inferred, the petitioners were entitled to summary confirmation.
Ruling
Judge George B. Daniels granted the petitioners’ unopposed motion for summary judgment confirming the arbitration award. The court directed the Clerk to close the motions at ECF Nos. 9 and 16 and to close the case.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated…Nov 2020
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Jun 2021
- District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades…Jun 2021
- Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated…Jun 2021
- Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund…May 2021
- Absolute Nevadav. Grand Majestic