Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 3, 2021

Moultrie v. Wright

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-03925
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Moultrie v. Wright, Judge Swain ordered Moultrie to pay $402 or submit a complete application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Mukadien Moultrie, who was required to pay $402 or submit an amended application within 30 days for the case to proceed.

What happened

In Moultrie v. Wright, Mukadien Moultrie submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees, but left nearly all questions unanswered. The court could not determine whether he could pay the fees.

The court ordered Moultrie, within 30 days, either to pay $402 or submit an amended application with answers and facts showing that he could not pay. No summons would issue at that time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain said the case would be processed if Moultrie complied and would be dismissed if he did not. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Moultrie v. Wright · No. 1:21-cv-03925
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 3, 2021

Background

Mukadien Moultrie brought the action without a lawyer. To proceed in the district court, he had to pay the filing and administrative fees or submit a signed application asking to proceed without prepayment of fees. Moultrie submitted such an application, but he failed to answer nearly all of its questions. The court therefore could not determine whether he could pay the fees.

Order

The court ordered Moultrie, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay $402 in fees or submit an amended application. The amended application had to include the docket number, answer the unanswered questions, and provide facts showing that Moultrie could not pay the fees. If the court granted the amended application, Moultrie would be allowed to proceed without prepaying fees.

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Moultrie and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that, if Moultrie complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

Disposition and Classification

This was an administrative order requiring payment of fees or a corrected application to proceed without prepayment. It did not decide the underlying claims against Parole Officer Wright. The order is classified as a procedural order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.