Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 4, 2021

Quezada v. BOSS Art Culture, LLC

Judge
Sidney Stein
Docket
1:21-cv-02143
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Quezada v. Boss Art Culture, LLC, Judge Stein adjourned the initial pretrial conference to May 13, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.

Who this affects

The parties and their lawyers were affected because the initial pretrial conference was moved from May 11, 2021, to May 13, 2021.

What happened

Quezada v. Boss Art Culture, LLC involved the defendant’s request to reschedule an initial pretrial conference set for May 11, 2021. The defendant’s lawyer said he had a scheduling conflict because of hearings in another case.

The defendant requested a different date and time, stating that this was the first such request and would not affect other scheduled dates. The plaintiff’s lawyer did not object.

Judge Sidney H. Stein granted the request by ordering that the conference be held on May 13, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Quezada v. BOSS Art Culture, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-02143
Judge
Sidney Stein
Date
May 4, 2021

Background An initial pretrial conference was scheduled for May 11, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel for Boss Art Culture, LLC reported a scheduling conflict because counsel was scheduled to appear at hearings in another matter in the Southern District of Florida Bankruptcy Court.

Request Boss Art Culture, LLC asked the court to adjourn, or reschedule, the conference. Counsel stated that this was the first request to adjourn the conference, that the request would not prejudice any party, and that it would not affect other scheduled dates. Counsel also stated that counsel for Quezada did not object.

Ruling Judge Sidney H. Stein ordered that the conference be adjourned to May 13, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. The opinion does not address the merits of the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.