Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 7, 2021

Warren v. Aba Noub, Ltd.

Judge
Sidney Stein
Docket
1:21-cv-00365
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Warren v. Aba Noub, Judge Stein approved a $42,500 wage settlement, changed the caption to an individual case, and closed the case.

Who this affects

Stanley Warren, his counsel, Aba Noub, Ltd., and the other defendants are affected by the approved individual wage settlement. The case was closed without collective- or class-action certification.

What happened

Stanley Warren sued Aba Noub, Ltd. and other defendants under federal and New York wage laws, seeking unpaid overtime and damages for allegedly improper wage notices. The parties reached a settlement and asked the court to approve it.

The court found the $42,500 settlement fair and reasonable despite not fully covering liquidated damages, penalties, or attorney’s fees. It also found the attorney’s fee award reasonable, the release limited to wage-related claims, and the mutual non-disparagement provision acceptable because it allowed truthful statements.

Judge Sidney H. Stein approved the settlement, directed the Clerk to change the caption because Warren settled individually without seeking class or collective-action certification, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Warren v. Aba Noub, Ltd. · No. 1:21-cv-00365
Judge
Sidney Stein
Date
May 7, 2021

Background

Stanley Warren brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law for unpaid overtime premium pay and alleged failures to provide proper wage notices. The complaint described the case as a collective and class action. The parties later reached a settlement and jointly asked the court to approve it.

Settlement review

The court reviewed the agreement under the required standards for Fair Labor Standards Act settlements. It considered whether the agreement was fair and reasonable, including the possible recovery, the burdens and expenses of continuing the case, litigation risks, the parties’ negotiations, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.

The total settlement was $42,500. Warren’s damages analysis estimated $28,130.36 in unpaid overtime wages and $10,000 in statutory damages for wage notices and statements. The settlement did not compensate Warren for liquidated damages or penalties and only partially compensated attorney’s fees, but the parties identified unresolved legal and factual disputes and the expected costs of discovery and trial.

The agreement allocated $14,749.99—approximately one-third of the settlement—to Warren’s counsel. Counsel provided contemporaneous time records supporting the requested fee. The court found the fee reasonable.

The release covered claims related to the action and federal, state, or local wage-and-hour laws. The court found that limitation sufficiently narrow. The agreement also contained a mutual non-disparagement clause with an exception for truthful statements, which the court found acceptable.

Ruling and case status

The court approved the settlement agreement. Because Warren settled individually and had not moved to certify a collective or class action, the court directed the Clerk to amend the caption to identify Stanley Warren as the plaintiff and Aba Noub, Ltd. and the other defendants as defendants. The court then directed the Clerk to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.