Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 11, 2021

Delacruz v. The State of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-04220
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Delacruz v. State of New York, Judge Swain ordered payment or an IFP application before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Danny Delacruz, who had to pay the required fees or submit the required application and authorization within 30 days for the action to proceed.

What happened

Danny Delacruz sued the State of New York and the Department of Correction while incarcerated and without a lawyer. He filed the complaint without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to request payment-free filing.

The court gave Delacruz 30 days to either pay $402 or submit a signed application to proceed without paying upfront, together with authorization for installment withdrawals from his prisoner account. The court said no summons would issue yet and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk to mail the order to Delacruz and record service. She also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied payment-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Delacruz v. The State of New York · No. 1:21-cv-04220
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 11, 2021

Background

Danny Delacruz brought this civil action while incarcerated at the Vernon C. Bain Center. He proceeded without a lawyer. The opinion states that he originally filed the complaint with other detainees, but the court separated the plaintiffs’ claims and opened separate actions. Delacruz submitted his complaint without paying the required fees and without a completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees or a prisoner authorization.

Payment or application requirement

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $402—the $350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without paying fees upfront. If that permission is granted, federal law requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. A prisoner seeking that status must submit a signed application, a prisoner authorization allowing withdrawals, and certified account statements for the prior six months.

The court ordered Delacruz, within 30 days of the order’s date, to either pay the $402 or submit the required application and authorization forms. The forms were to identify docket number 21-CV-4220 (LTS).

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk to mail Delacruz a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The case would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures if Delacruz complied; if he did not comply within the allowed period, the action would be dismissed. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied payment-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order did not decide the underlying claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.