Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 13, 2021

Bowes v. American Eagle Outfitters Inc

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:18-cv-09004
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Bowes v. American Eagle Outfitters, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice, while leaving absent putative class members unbound.

Who this affects

Brooke Bowes and American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. and AEO Management Co. were bound by the dismissal; absent putative class members were not bound by the dismissal or any settlement.

What happened

In Brooke Bowes v. American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. and AEO Management Co., the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the agreement’s terms.

The court canceled scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs or attorneys’ fees to either party, and directed the clerk to close the case. The parties could ask to reopen the case within 30 days by showing good cause.

Judge Valerie Caproni also removed the class-action language from the caption. Because the parties had not told the court they would follow the rule governing class settlements, the dismissal and any settlement applied only to Bowes and the defendants and did not bind absent putative class members.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bowes v. American Eagle Outfitters Inc · No. 1:18-cv-09004
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
May 13, 2021

Background The parties notified the court on May 12, 2021, that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not state the agreement’s terms.

Orders The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The court allowed the parties to apply to reopen the case within 30 days. Such an application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the parties’ settlement. The court also explained that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining jurisdiction within the same 30-day period.

Class allegations The court directed the clerk to remove the language stating that Brooke Bowes sued individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. Because the parties had not notified the court that they intended to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), which governs certain class settlements and dismissals, the court stated that the dismissal and any settlement were operative only between Bowes and the defendants. They did not bind absent putative class members.

Disposition Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and ordered it closed, subject to the stated 30-day procedures for reopening the case or requesting retention of jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.