Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 13, 2021

Petroceli v. U.S. Department of Justice

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-03997
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Petroceli v. U.S. Department of Justice, Judge Swain dismissed a duplicate complaint without prejudice to the pending case.

Who this affects

Domingos Lugao Petroceli’s duplicate lawsuit was dismissed, while his earlier related case remained pending. The listed defendants were the U.S. Department of Justice, the Attorney’s Office SDNY, and Southern District of New York, Manhattan Federal Court.

What happened

In Petroceli v. U.S. Department of Justice, Domingos Lugao Petroceli, representing himself, filed a complaint against the U.S. Department of Justice and other listed defendants.

The court found that Petroceli had already filed a nearly identical complaint asserting the same claims, and that earlier case was still pending under docket number 1:21-CV-3675 (UA). The court said litigating this duplicate lawsuit would serve no useful purpose.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed this complaint as duplicative, without prejudice to Petroceli’s pending case. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Petroceli v. U.S. Department of Justice · No. 1:21-cv-03997
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 13, 2021

Background

Domingos Lugao Petroceli brought this action without a lawyer against the U.S. Department of Justice; the Attorney’s Office SDNY; and Southern District of New York, Manhattan Federal Court. The court stated that Petroceli had previously submitted a nearly identical complaint against the defendants asserting the same claims. That earlier case remained pending under docket number 1:21-CV-3675 (UA).

Court’s Reasoning

The court concluded that the present complaint duplicated the claims in the pending case. It stated that no useful purpose would be served by litigating the duplicate lawsuit.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint as duplicative, without prejudice to Petroceli’s pending case under docket number 1:21-CV-3675 (UA). The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the Clerk of Court to mail Petroceli a copy of the order and note service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.