Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 24, 2021

Croskey v. United States of America

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-04483
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Croskey v. United States, Judge Swain ordered Nathaniel Croskey to pay fees or submit authorization within 30 days.

Who this affects

Nathaniel Croskey and the processing of his civil action by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

What happened

In Croskey v. United States of America, Nathaniel Croskey filed a civil case without a lawyer and submitted an application to proceed without paying fees upfront. The court said he was detained at Essex County Correctional Facility in Newark, New Jersey.

Croskey had not submitted the separate authorization required for the court to withdraw filing-fee payments from his account in installments. The court gave him 30 days to pay $402 in fees or submit the completed authorization.

Judge Laura Swain ordered the Clerk to mail the order to Croskey and said no summons would issue yet. If Croskey does not comply, the action will be dismissed; the order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Croskey v. United States of America · No. 1:21-cv-04483
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 24, 2021

Background

Nathaniel Croskey brought this civil action without a lawyer. The opinion states that he was detained at Essex County Correctional Facility in Newark, New Jersey. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying filing fees, but he did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Court’s Order

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $402 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepayment by submitting both a signed application and a prisoner authorization. If the court grants the application, the $350 filing fee is collected in installments from the prisoner’s account under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and provide certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the previous six months.

The court ordered Croskey, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $402 or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 21-CV-4483. The Clerk was directed to mail him a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Croskey complied, and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time.

Other Ruling and Effect

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order did not rule on the merits of Croskey’s claims. It also cautioned that a future dismissal of a prisoner’s federal civil action as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim can count as a qualifying dismissal, or “strike,” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.