Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 25, 2021

Jackson v. Department of Corrections

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:20-cv-09420
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureMotion to DismissPro Se
In one sentence

In Jackson v. Department of Corrections, Judge Broderick dismissed the action without prejudice after Jackson failed to state a claim or prosecute it.

Who this affects

James Jackson’s action was dismissed without prejudice. The order also directed the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the complaint and mail the order to Jackson; the opinion does not describe any separate relief affecting the defendants.

What happened

Jackson v. Department of Corrections began when James Jackson and 49 other detainees filed a complaint together. The court later separated their claims into individual cases and placed an amended complaint in each case.

The court said the amended complaint did not explain how the defendants violated Jackson’s constitutional rights. It gave him two opportunities to file a more specific complaint and warned that failing to do so could lead to dismissal. Jackson filed neither a new complaint nor an explanation for missing the final deadline.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute. The clerk was directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint and mail the order to Jackson, who was representing himself.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jackson v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-09420
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
May 25, 2021

Background

James Jackson filed a complaint on October 7, 2020, together with 49 other detainees. Magistrate Judge Stewart Aaron later separated the plaintiffs’ claims and directed that each plaintiff’s claims proceed in a separate action. An amended complaint filed in the related proceeding was docketed in Jackson’s separate action as well.

Opportunities to Amend

In a March 22, 2021 order, the court found that the amended complaint did not specify how the defendants violated Jackson’s constitutional rights. The court allowed Jackson to file a second amended complaint by April 23, 2021, and warned that failing to do so without good cause could result in dismissal for failure to state a claim. After Jackson missed that deadline without filing a complaint or explaining the failure, the court extended the deadline to May 24, 2021 and repeated the warning.

Jackson did not file a second amended complaint or provide an explanation by the extended deadline.

Ruling

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered that the action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b) and 41(b). A dismissal without prejudice does not itself bar a later filing, although the opinion does not discuss any requirements or limitations that might apply. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the complaint and mail a copy of the order to Jackson, who was representing himself.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.